1. Should this Court summarily reverse when a
court of appeals defies clear, unmistakable decisions of
this Court?

2. Should a judge or a jury decide whether a
public employee's speech is pursuant to his ordinary job
duties, such that the speech is not protected by the First
Amendment?

Should a court of appeals be summarily reversed for defying clear Supreme Court precedent, and should a judge or jury determine whether public employee speech is within ordinary job duties for First Amendment protection purposes?