1). Is the application of the Prison litigation Reform Act ("PLRA "), "Three-
Strike " Rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) to Petitioner 's prior dismissals under
Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 41 (1971)( "Younger Abstence Doctrine ")
unreasonable as the cases were automatically dismissed and should
' not trigger a PLRA strike? "

2). Is the PLRA unconstitutional under the United States First Amendment
and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, considering prisoners have a
constitutional right to access the courts.

3). Does the PLRA violate equal protection of the United States by denying
court access to indigent prisoners while affording it to similarly situated
prisoners who can pay the filing fee, and treating prisoners differently
from other litigants?

Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act's 'Three-Strike' Rule is unconstitutionally applied to a prisoner's prior Younger abstention dismissals and violates First Amendment and equal protection rights