Askari Danso MS Lumumba, fka Dale Lee Pughsley v. Jeffrey Kiser
1. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with this Court's
decision in United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), that a prison regulation
was not overbroad because facially expansive terms could be narrowed by
reference to "context."
2. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with other Circuits, that
prison regulation of outbound inmate correspondence is governed by the
extremely deferential balancing test of Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987),
rather than the more speech-protective standard this Court adopted in Procunier
v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974).
3. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by applying Turner balancing to a First
Amendment overbreadth claim.
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in applying Turner v. Safley balancing test to a First Amendment overbreadth challenge involving prison regulation of inmate correspondence