1. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO BE RESENTENCED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT THAT IN
VOLVES A "QUID PRO QUO" AND WAS HIS COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL
.INEFFECTIVE.

2. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO HAVE ALL
SENTENCES TO RUN "CONCURRENT" SINCE NO MENTION OF
"CONCURRENT" OR "CONSECUTIVE" SENTENCES WERE EVER EVEN
MENTIONED IN HIS PLEA AGREEMENT OFFER.

3. WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO HAVE HIS
"NO PAROLE" STIPULATION REMOVED AFTER 42 YEARS OF INC
ARCERATION SINCE HE HAD AND HAS MENTAL DISABILITIES THAT
PROVES MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES AND THAT HE WAS INCOMPETENT
TO ENTER HIS GUILTY PLEAS.

Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on ineffective counsel, plea agreement terms, and mental disability claims