No. 24-6060
Albert Trampis Dogskin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split false-information judicial-discretion plea-agreement sentencing-error
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether there is an exception to an appeal waiver in a plea agreement where the district court relied on false or unreliable information in sentencing.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is an exception to an appeal waiver in a plea agreement where the district court relied on false or unreliable information in sentencing
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-12
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2025)
Attorneys
Albert Trampis Dogskin
Sandy Baggett — Sandy Baggett, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent