No. 24-6058
Tags: adaptive-behavior atkins-standard clinical-assessment eighth-amendment intellectual-disability iq-testing
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the state court run afoul of Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), when it ignored an applicant's full range of IQ scores in favor of a single part-score and deferred to an expert who did not conduct a complete adaptive behavior assessment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the state court violate Atkins v. Virginia by improperly assessing intellectual disability through a single IQ score and incomplete adaptive behavior assessment?
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-18
Reply of Blaine Keith Milam submitted.
2025-02-18
Reply of petitioner Blaine Keith Milam filed. (Distributed)
2025-02-03
Brief of Texas in opposition submitted.
2025-02-03
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2025-01-03
Amicus brief of Randy W. Kamphaus, Kevin S. McGrew, Cecil R. Reynolds, W. Joel Schneider and Marc J. Tassé submitted.
2025-01-03
Brief amici curiae of Randy W. Kamphaus, et al. filed.
2024-12-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 3, 2025.
2024-12-27
Motion of Texas for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2025 to February 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2025)
2024-10-15
Application (24A347) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 28, 2024.
2024-10-09
Application (24A347) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 29, 2024 to November 28, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Blaine Keith Milam
Randy W. Kamphaus, Kevin S. McGrew, Cecil R. Reynolds, W. Joel Schneider and Marc J. Tassé
John H. Blume — Amicus
Texas
Tomee Morgan Heining — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent