Shawn M. Berila v. Tom Watson, Warden
IS A PETITIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF DUE PROCES VIOLATED WHEN A DISTRICT COURT DOES NOT ALLOW A PETITIONER AN EXTENSION TO OBJECT TO THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION?
I. IS A PETITIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT TRIAL IS INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A GUILTY VERDICT AND AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE?
II. IS A PETITIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL RECORD DOES NOT SUPPORT A SENTENCE WITH CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES?
III. IS A PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL VIOLATED WHEN A TRIAL COUNSEL DOES NOT INVESTIGATE A PETIT JURY ARRAY AND COUNSELS MISCONDUCT AND TRIAL ERRORS ARE ACCUMALATIVE TO SUPPORT INEVECTIVE ASSISTANCE?
IV. IS A PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL VIOLATED WHEN THERE IS APPELLATE COUNSEL MISCONDUCT AND COUNSEL ERRORS IN THE APPELLATE PROCESS?
V. IS A PETITIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THERE IS JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT AND ERRORS AT TRIAL AND SENTENCING?
VI. IS A PETITIONER'S RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THERE IS TRIAL JURY'MISCONDUCT AND ERRORS?
VII. IS A PETITIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW WHEN THERE IS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AT TRIAL?
VIII.
Whether a petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights are violated when a district court does not allow an extension to object to a report and recommendation