No. 24-604

Xiaoqing Zheng v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference judicial-interpretation kisor-standard sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw TradeSecret Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-04-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the limits on agency deference articulated in Kisor limit the deference owed to the United States Sentencing Commission's commentary on intended loss under 2B1.1 Application Note 3 of the Sentencing Guidelines.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the limits on agency deference articulated in Kisor limit the deference owed to the United States Sentencing Commission's commentary on intended loss under 2B1.1 Application Note 3 of the Sentencing Guidelines

Docket Entries

2025-04-07
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/4/2025.
2025-03-18
Reply of Xiaoqing Zheng submitted.
2025-03-18
2025-03-04
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-03-04
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 4, 2025.
2025-01-27
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2025 to March 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 3, 2025.
2024-12-09
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2025 to February 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 2, 2025)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Xiaoqing Zheng
Bradley Lamar HenryBlank Rome, Petitioner