1. Whether a state court that applies a sufficiency of the evidence standard to
determine a habeas petitioner was not prejudiced by his trial counsel's deficient
performance acts contrary to or unreasonably applies the clearly established
standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

2. Whether a state court that fails to consider the entire trial record before
determining a habeas petitioner was not prejudiced by his trial counsel's deficient
performance acts contrary to Strickland and its progeny, and unreasonably
determines the facts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2).

Whether a state court unreasonably applies the Strickland standard when evaluating habeas petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim by failing to comprehensively review trial record