1. Should the US. Supreme Court intervene in protection of itsgapellate jucisdiztion by issuing a permanent injunction against the highest courts of appeals in Texas, said courts having erected an ABSOLUTE BAR, for petitioners seeking review in the U.S. Supreme Court via ZB USCS $1257, oF 28 uScS $1254, said petitioner (s\ having the right to utilize the Statute ) and having no other avenue to enforce thei right to seek U.S. Supreme Court review. That bar created, and made effective through: the faudulent report, of publication ofa purported "Notice of Action, which is not representative of a REN DERED ORDER delivered by a legally cognizable body of rhe respective court?

2. Is it Ok, For elected state court of Prcials to defraud, or Inanipulate the federal courts into abstaining frum the review of daimed violations of federal, and state Constitutional Rights, in either civil or ériminal cases, through a contrived Scheme, wherein State actors Communicate an alleged decision har been reached, all without the court having RENDERED AN ORDER, the courts Cleck Rucrher being UNABLE To PRov2DE A CERTIFIED COPY OF ANY ORDER(S) PROVING FINAL STATE ACTION?

Whether the Supreme Court should issue a permanent injunction against state courts that have created an absolute bar to seeking Supreme Court review through fraudulent court actions and failure to provide certified orders