May "the Court of Appeals } after approving a noilce of appeal } u)itbdrauJ
the briefing schedule on Abe basis that X revested appointment of Counsel
to assist mein presentingmy claim? Thereby > Abe. court became aoJare that
e\/en Ahouyb X had a legitimate (eyal issue X u)as not able of presenting
the problem by myself, in immediacy . XVius> the^ court bullied me uJitb an
order to shouo cause, UHimateiy , denied nry request to reinstate my appeal
and. Aten Affirmed Abe district courts decision that Contained an impermissible
ruling. All done in violation of Abe riaVt of doe process *

Xt Abe district Court erroneously recharacterized a parties Role 33 (bVf)
neoa trial motion * Ahat was Submitted under Criminal Role 37 during Abe direct
appeal > as a motion Abe collateral relief under title § 2755, thus > prevented a.
timely assertion cf Abe motion before Abe Court <f Appeals affirmed Abe conviction.
If Abe date Abat Abe initial motion Was submitted equitably toll^ ibe time fof
revieu) regardless AW Abe Rule 37 motion was filed after Abe direct appeal )
doe An Abe district courts own improper action Abat Caused Abe filing delay.
May Abe Court refuse to correct their own , intentional 5 clerical error ?

And is tbe district courts interpretation cf federal Rules of Criminal froceduie
Statute of limitations not Subject to reVvCto tbroUyb a Second appeal ?

May the Court of Appeals withdraw the briefing schedule after approving a notice of appeal and deny a request for appointed counsel, thereby violating due process rights?