No. 24-5995

Manuel Espinoza-Camacho v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split judicial-discretion sentencing-factors sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily requires the court of appeals to reweigh the sentencing factors?

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Manuel Espinoza-Camacho
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent