Question Presented (from Petition)
(1). DID CHIEF JUDGE SMITH VIOLATED 28 USC 352 (A) BY DETERMING
DISPUTED FACT;IN MR.GREGORY'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DISTRICT JUDGE
STEVEN BOUGH AND OTHER APPEALLANT COURT JUDGES .
(2). WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED A FAIR AND UNPARTIAL REVIEW BY THE JUDICAL
COUNCEL.
(3). WAS MR.GREGORY DENIED DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO HAD HIS COMPLAINT
APPEAL REVIEW BY A FIVE-JUDGE PANEL.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Chief Judge Smith violated 28 USC 352(a) by determining disputed facts in Mr. Gregory's complaint against district court judges and whether Mr. Gregory was denied due process and fair judicial review
Docket Entries
2025-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
2024-12-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-11-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Bryan L. Gregory
Bryan Lee Gregory — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent