Does Michigan violate a defendant's constitutional right to jury unanimity when the State Supreme Court refuses to recognize the difference in unanimity claims in context of instances of conduct and elements, as well as the proprietary tests applicable to each, that not only this Court but numerous federal courts of appeals and state supreme courts have recognized in a multipe acts case claim of unanimous verdict violation?

Does Michigan violate a defendant's constitutional right to jury unanimity when the State Supreme Court refuses to recognize the difference in unanimity claims in context of instances of conduct and elements?