No. 24-597
Jonathan Eugene Brunson v. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General of North Carolina, et al.
Tags: circuit-split heck-dismissal in-forma-pauperis prison-litigation-reform-act section-1983 three-strikes-rule
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in holding that dismissals under Heck categorically constitute strikes under the PLRA.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether dismissals under Heck v. Humphrey categorically constitute strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's three-strikes rule
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-13
Reply of Jonathan Brunson submitted.
2025-01-13
Reply of petitioner Jonathan Brunson filed. (Distributed)
2024-12-31
Brief of Joshua Stein, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-31
Brief of respondents Joshua Stein, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due January 2, 2025)
Attorneys
Jonathan Brunson
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
Joshua Stein, et al.
Ryan Young Park — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent