(1. The People have no standing to interject between an accused and his right of self-representation . When the court permits them to do so, does it undermine Faretta by encouraging prosecutors who cannot win fairly, to win by instigating revocation, as here?

(2. Did the court err by permitting the People's representation of evi dence to be the sole cause as the loss of self-representation? . (Carillo v. County of Los Angeles , 798 F.3d. 1210, 1220 (9th Cir. 2015) (appointing the prosecutor to act as the arbiter of relevant evidence is tantamount to "appoint[ing] the fox as henhouse guard. )).

(3. Does "[t]he right to be heard before being condemned to suffer griev- ious loss of any kind" (Mathew v. Eldridge , 424 US 319, 323 (1976)) apply to Faretta revocation ?

(4. Can a deleted statement be the sole cause of the loss of the right of self-representation?

(5. Has the substantial Sixth Amendment right of self-representation been been reduced to a farce or a sham?

Whether a trial court improperly revoked a defendant's pro se status during an evidentiary hearing and violated Sixth Amendment speedy trial rights