I<• WUetUer or peWo^'S 5^ c^d \4^ avM£wVueJ:S 'rtcjJr Vo
eldfc pro&£S<S u!ta£ Vtetal^cl ^e; o<ppfc4 CetKt Vo
feMW appointed Counsel a6 fecpe^bd 6<uct deeli'^ed -to ml&
AU v^tS 'of 4U> issafcs preseuM 'U Maz prose b*\e£On \
oh 14LertUr or Ao\- iMwlig^^V (W be +Wed UiiUouV \MVi^
PofreuVtal ag^i'ASV fMAAjoyrctvi+S V Voir dlire ■
VLgaa Se4 \Jo\r <4* re Vr^se^ipfs.P/

Whether a pro se litigant's right to due process was violated when the court failed to appoint counsel and declined to rule on all issues presented