1. Whether translated out-of-court testimonial statements may be admitted by the Government as evidence against a defendant without providing the defendant with an opportunity to cross-examine the interpreter, and without violating the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution, simply because the interpreter is deemed to be either an agent of the defendant or acted as a language conduit.

2. Whether the Alien Harboring Act establishes criminal liability over individuals who merely shelter a non-citizen with intent to violate the law, absent some further effort to conceal the non-citizen from the authorities.

Whether translated out-of-court testimonial statements may be admitted without violating the Confrontation Clause when the interpreter is deemed an agent or language conduit