1. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA ERRED IN NOT FINDING THAT THE OBJECTIVE CIRCUMSTANCES SHOWED THAT PETITIONER GLOVER WAS IN CUSTODY DURING HIS ENTIRE POLICE INTERROGATION WITHOUT TRIGGER MIRANDA WARNINGS

2. WHETHER A POLICE OFFICER'S DISCLOSURE TO AN INDIVIDUAL THAT HE'S A "SUSPECT" HAS ANY BEARING UPON THE QUESTION WHETHER THE INDIVIDUAL IS IN CUSTODY FOR PURPOSES OF MIRANDA.

Whether the Court of Appeals of Georgia erred in not finding that the objective circumstances required that petitioner Glover was in custody for purposes of Miranda during his entire police interrogation which triggered Miranda warnings?