Is it fundamental error for a trial court to consider a subsequent offence without arrest or conviction is fashioning a sentence for a violation of probation which had been violated two (2) years prior?

Is it an unreasonable application of law where a trial court imposes a sentence on a defendant for the "entire depth of her criminality " and not the actual violation of probation?

Whether a trial court commits fundamental error by considering a subsequent offense without arrest or conviction when sentencing a probation violation from two years prior, and whether such sentencing based on the 'entire depth of her criminality' constitutes an unreasonable application of law