Dean oP a Dpprtmett buiiding-Ghovld We Wou) Raa Jrstice' that a tego FonlDeo 2 Door Mart Pret be Added 40 the Commou "ang OT" Areas oP pretmesT buildines Dae A The Curtilroe 13 Tein THely \inKed to the dvdellings rStecinly | the Dear 3 xs Tmmediere Ourroanding , both Physically 3 Pouchotog:cally, tad ZS Where DR VACY EKPECTATIONS Are MosT Neigh ened, will WoT +nis Hight be. Given too UnitedG totes Citizens udho live te TpATMeNT buildiugd? Jastice'S should Whitaker 14-3290 be Also "Nation ally" Controlled DY ny I Jar dines TSP Kyl" .

eld thet where. the Govermenit Uses device hat TS MoT TM geuierAl Pablic. OSE, +o Explore — detatis of the Lome DWeilingy that Would Reeviously Have beet UNKNoS Able with= Ouk physical —cuitrusioN theSurveil\ANCE 3 K-49 SME F on tne, LearS zg 2 , " Searely" Aud IS Presumptively Un reagauAble udithouk ® UarradT Glows you Not Roree thay Whitater 14-3290 Should be Controtled ly Ky ile AS _Srrdincs TS Bud Made NPrrioNly LAW "or the Millions oF People Udhe Live IM 'FipartoeniT | Buildings —s Roy the Fourth med Ment For Dil Udtted GiaeS Citizens +o hove Protection * Security "tuside : \ \ \le Aud auisede rere Doar ty asd dubelliugS INO There ApAFT MENT Ustag Sensitive devices Mer Available +o the Qetlern| public?

Whether the government's use of a tracking device to monitor an individual's movements in a private apartment complex without a warrant violates Fourth Amendment privacy protections