No. 24-5867
Colt Jacoby Barnett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DID THE DISTRI CT COURT ERR IN OVERRULING MR. BARNETT' S
OBJECTION TO THE TWO-LEVEL UPWARD ADJUSTMENT
PURSUANT TO U.S.S.G. 2 G2.2(B)(6 ) WHERE THERE IS THE USE OF
A COM PUTER ?
2. IS THE FACTUAL BASIS TO SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT MR.
BARNETT' S CONVICTIONS ?
3. DID THE DISTRICT COURT REVER SIBLY ERR BY DENYING MR.
BARNETT' S MOTION TO DISM ISS THE INDICTM ENT BECAUSE 18
U.S.C. § 2252A VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND THE
SEPARATION-OF-POW ERS DOCTRINE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Colt Jacoby Barnett
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent