fl\To Ikrik l\Oe_Vr^ci£l^ Cii* ^ (I&a^V yA)
'2A\)Llk±l^ \Afe.'Aro$ V^W
Ld^ c-VW U vW lAr^tcP- tooA $or
IH'TW SV-A*. tootle \LioUcel Vk Ao-c Wsi. ri^Y" YK 'cufriiL
•for W&wWlAk* k4k W<\<A ?U Wl ,«tem+£«> A fcAuiL A UvJ WtJ.
^OUtd c.Vo^A fWrAktfe.Vio.rt Yd Ar'/AU^J Uir'.V A Vck^S
Cm** dA.A o« krU VroC^Aofi W ?rw^ Y'lrY^lSf /wM J* „
Co<v\llc>tloA? a* A *J*OeA ?r^V^V,OA ^ \tW\cm) \M OA^ a/zaU^\\iiAdAu>vi
a 4r4-W^ A
djOA^k^/asA ? \A vk \JA.L Vi'o zAicnOA^e
DAac\

Whether a state court's denial of post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel claims violates a criminal defendant's constitutional rights to due process and effective representation