K, h</S rarest*-!ah'*si over -the <Je£svd*srf [ ohjc&fv&p is ^/ficjecP fionnorpb /*■<4
hybrid rcP/tSfr>fet?)>a / cAn the c/ePyst*nt /4v> jtd< ccvirioo a~fi hvh^'tfs ircfficPyut tffisP&ncc
of Course. f un der the 6tf> Amendment 7

t. hoes w odk/iiory I sherdby /hybrid cpjnSe/h&ot tCnfithlereA access do & JvdfiJ cjnutifiers Psofe
trite oh finch 4nd &rn»fSSf'osi to approach the btrch jby himseffi Cuith tr u/pfh&sP Ah A Pbr~ or'
eiqh'Ash" firO $£ dependents btlo'lr CdAShtu/t OnSo/Cc'tcol per h eipaten op pScUfstP u. Iptf/hf ?

2. id hen sic^d by, due -ho Jud(cS Ur 1, i'A9 j St tne-ffcctivt f'n his unc/em colt os sd&ntbu attoSocy
COusSc'l j does tivch Oh/rSe,! uiotatd deh&nAcnt s £+4 AmcsAfr&t nifht G,too-S euC/h Pk/t/U a*A
its ProStny 'tAdsnsthc i/. fdiffriJ ?

d. Stt the* cr>xloSefisuites &nd erroneous roturt op sfis,c/h?y/cd<St>ny coonSt,/a^o/ntmerit PS
Uidl OS ttf t'Pjtobhnwh Pcrl/dfiction dependanth ob/ect#'* if So (aft detcndaitu r/jbt t° es
■fair a.1 7

S*jfc S/tMbu or odutSer-j Counsel $ UnSojirifid pcrh'ctp^fbn Pro s-e.lihcfo^tt she*d h y/mdrtprtsctdiH
dnd does oil sobcttfueA actons txy same, fw at&ol of the doctrine o t cdpAs/d **4.
the nsM ho Sc/p rtpflft* Ut*n 7

hit. C/fa euh/iiorji sUd by Or hyiyn'd CCunteland Qi^the OPfioinitVKnh thereat [rSo/nte dependent^
ri( h h ho CL prir trio.! Cun.d ihe, brf* Atnerddat he i/Solk/ed and Cp not, is tut pcft*te,Ss err&r* 7

-2i- "T-P S'fond b<-j i role. cs tUh he must'be renAy ter assume norma/ Gif

Whether a pro se defendant's hybrid representation and standby counsel's participation violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel and fair trial