Carl Javan Ross v. Carlos D. Bivens, Warden, et al.
Immigration
Qm C°urh 'wort proof of 'innocence,esftciulfy Vti -fww/<y fi&nf
45 \f '&S f)of a r i$hfWi° QlJ So^tant-jui/p, wA 4fi@r m j>
by drLlC *■ ** * M T ^^ ^ r 7 ^ '
3 fa a n Do) Ice SPY or> CrynpUcfery qncj P-e&Pfar ff&Pe/r'~p/ ~3~'Cad
before ob-fa'^/sy q W4^f t^ ov*- *3^
0-Pftce.r JI,
x.
p C.oift Polite f°inA- qp tny Acetycnow'ny -f^ff \j^e(J afafaer- wqXXs
5t tfaowi Cour p QfeM&ri'h pfoPecccfjon <?-C e\ {/ policy./ ct'f-j-our-flQ.ys /judy^s qr\d
Anyone. f€L)q-beJ k> ihe. Wftfce- Jeprfment or- jucl/cla / branch k&^nse.
vf/^h.e!r occuptf-h/o^eJe^ when Ay are proven lying F) jej- udeferyM-f*&c tefyyCrlmlr
rv\0[^<2jr, eq( or &c-HOr / J
c\n4 yh/L courjj AqineJ r
CaP) Coo r-fa Jonty my rfafa *h * speejy -hrlaj^ c^uniboktyy / IwpJ&ek/nL
r\ yilgk't risk \Jhtfy JT work offa q fopce. detyotrAnnenh -ftrr
b\0/± v^y house, unless 7° shop, deny me fabrh netyJ Cory
, ^ . Air kr/a/wd ^ rj3^ fa ddr*# 3rMwes ufaessj:yyh
PLlrtis of hilar) <v> )m**t*- wo^ ^' h>y Vt*
Corn fiAf-cr T
ll* Cah Cowrit \bh'{*-Jz-feniwjy who wfa^ily hwe. child P<
C(r\A raPitH o€ child f^P, \cfah 3 morph S&nfenoty or 4vdptye4 .
P^y f'nAna- in j^iI 7yn<e_
Wr&n
ll* Cj\n Cou,rjs
q/]A fapjCH of chin r^, 3 or d^optyej cJvyyer
^pyey- qJnlWy ^ ^ on ^ P^yfAv^ }r
I2~. Cat P°Vte fall * fe&r&giflfttod if At confab kOnim^
Whether law enforcement officers can be held liable for fabricating evidence and lying under oath when their actions potentially obstruct justice and violate constitutional rights