1. Does a court abuse its discretion in upholding a conviction and sentence for a crime that was clearly disproven at trial, based solely on the factual findings of a jury and the oral pronouncement of the Judge at sentencing?

2. Does a court abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for dismissal of conviction for respondent's failure to disclose evidence of their possessing?

3. Are uncharged and unadjudicated prior bad acts allegedly committed while defendant was a juvenile against another juvenile admissable as propensity evidence to prove an attempt to commit a crime?

4. Does a defendant invite error or waive error in the admission of evidence by cross-examining a witness and challenging evidence after it was presented over objection?

5. Can a defendant be allowed to bolster and make false claims to the jury?

6. Can a defendant be sentenced and convicted of a crime where age is a key element, without a jury determination of fact on that element?

7. Can a defendant in a criminal case be sentenced on the basis of an invalid premise or inaccurate information?

8. Does the best evidence rule apply to the record contents of cell phones, such that before admission of secondary evidence of those contents, the primary evidence must be unavailable and inaccessable, not in their possession and disproven?

Whether a trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion to suppress impeachment evidence and admitting prior bad acts evidence that prejudicially impacted the defendant's right to a fair trial