[I]. WHETHER THE COMMONWEALTH COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION OR COMMITTED AN ERROR OF LAW, BECAUSE APPLYING Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) TO CONCLUDE WAIVER OF ERROR OF LAW, APPELLANT'S "ONLY CLAIM" IS IN CONFLICT WITH Pa.R.A.P. 1925, WHERE THE TRIAL COURT DID NOT ORDER A 1925(b) STATEMENT AND THE APPELLANT DID NOT FILE ONE?

[II]. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION OR COMMITTED AN ERROR OF LAW, BECAUSE THE COURT FAILED TO CONSIDER THAT IN REM FORFEITURE WOULD VIOLATE THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, IN CONFLICT WITH SUPREME COURT HOLDING IN Commonwealth V. 1997 Chevrolet, 639 Pa. 239, 160 A.3d 153 (Pa. 2017)?

Whether the Commonwealth Court abused its discretion by applying Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) to conclude waiver of error, conflicting with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 and procedural requirements