No. 24-5768
James H. Roane v. United States
Tags: categorical-approach criminal-statute force-clause racketeering-enterprise VICAR-statute violent-force
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Related Cases:
24-5322
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a § 924(c) conviction is predicated on a VICAR offense, must a reviewing court apply the categorical approach to the state or federal statute underpinning the VICAR offense to assess whether the underlying statute categorically requires the intentional or knowing use of violent force?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a § 924(c) conviction is predicated on a VICAR offense, must a reviewing court apply the categorical approach to the state or federal statute underpinning the VICAR offense to assess whether the underlying statute categorically requires the intentional or knowing use of violent force?
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-14
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2024-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2024)
2024-08-02
Application (24A123) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 11, 2024.
2024-07-31
Application (24A123) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 12, 2024 to October 11, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
James Roane
Shawn Nolan — Federal Community Defender Office for the EDPA, Petitioner
United States
Brian Halligan Fletcher — Department of Justice, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent