(1) Did the Fourth Circuit and District Court abuse its discretion under the 14th amend. for not deciding on the merits that the de Fenda. of de Siberate Ind Fference (14 th & 8th amend. ) For dis joewS ing Cant-Cereus harmFul Agewt fo him luder Uns Cos tro versy 16 Quiles Lens ce £
(i) tas it pewshy ais Covered Evidence, when 2 et tiever Fund ost Thrash Commer cials_in the begining OF Juve ins 2022 thet Zowtae wns prs Can-Cereus Agent and that 7 ans av Abuse OF discretion For the Fourth Circuit And. ais trict Court fo not decide bins part) ap Pint clrim against flatly SecF pnd wirrdew Bishoa LEO pmend. doe process J °
(ta) Usas_it py due process NW amend. Wwolntien For the Uprden Weber Com roissiones brittani , Types pud_Jod: for wot properly mvest gaz_ ing Video FoeTage (herd Evidence) Far aver 25 days OF missed medi Cations I~ which Goutd have Caused Petihavers death 2.
U3). Did purse. Sierra, Nolan Commct dé tibernte: Dodi FFerence inder the Hi pul 8th pend. thers She denied Paditjiaver immediate medical at-tention under Crse Laws proteca, 2
(4) Did Nurees From WiC. 7. [Temerla and priscilla, ) Cavite: bute, 'fo Com=writing deliberate Idi Ffecenwe (19% nol 8%) by wot dispensing LiFe threating thedication . ushith Occyred over 95 times a
US) Did doctor Robert Ui Mipms. Comm + _de liberate Ind: FFereuce - inder [47 Aud 8 amend, by ig woring. the. wurse \ tubent She. tof a him that petitioners vitals pared brenthing wars Abnormal Lnvous~cing petitioner had history with bleed clots 2
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals improperly applied due process standards in reviewing a district court's evidentiary rulings and potential procedural errors