No. 24-5733

Brent Evan Webster v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review bankruptcy-court judicial-misconduct procedural-due-process property-dispute title-fraud
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was it fair & just, bad faith or a misinterpretation of the law that on FEB 29 2024 Circuit Judges CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and H.A. THOMAS, sustained Molly C. Dwyer Clerks ORDER from JAN 8 2024, implying "title fraud " appears frivolous that she can dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute without further notice even if appellant submits "statement appeal should go forward ", suspended briefing pending further orders at which time Judges denied "motion to proceed in forma pauperis " dismissing case without explanation as (frivolous or malicious) even- though petitioner paid many fees and proved "title-fraud " multiple times, and also proved obfuscation by Judge Peter McKittrick after he performed duties of Trustee in 2012 for the same estate: 8707 SE 347th Ave. Boring, Oregon USA; assisting the Law Firm of McCarthy Holthus LLP on JAN 4 2023 to strip the family of the farm while Select Portfolio Servicing was pending in this court after utilizing deceptive assignments then sold the farm to Redwood Holdings who sold the farm to Valentyn Budianu while still in dispute, and who has now taken possession of Webster 's property without standing, still waiting to close on chain-of-title as free and clear.

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation of the law that Molly C. Dwyer Clerk, on JAN 8 2024 implied title theft is frivolous, and as Clerk she may dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute without further notice even if appellant submits "statement appeal should go forward " then suspending briefing pending further order of the court?

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation, of the law that US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon Judge Peter McKittrick on January 4, 2023 claimed "there are no grounds to reopen Debtor 's chapter 13 case", even though as trustee he had fully-administrated the property in the Alta Azonia Haney 2012 bankruptcy protecting Webster as a spouse?

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation of the law that US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon Judge Peter McKittrick on July 6, 2020 signed an order of dismissal administratively closing case after discovering the substantive matters of Carolyn Wade making false claims with forged documents and SPS using deceptive assignments to claim title.

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation of the law that during the July 2, 2020 hearing US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon Judge Peter McKittrick ignored irrefutable testimony about SPS, from investigator William J. Paatalo about deceptive assignments in the chain- of-title indicative of fraud, further failing to provide a promised hearing to verify SPS was a "true " party of interest before denying a plausible plan?

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation of the law that after all the testimony on July 2, 2020 US Bankruptcy Court District of Oregon Judge Peter McKittrick composed an Order denying Webster 's Motion to Convert to a Chapter 12 family farmer or allow him to submit a better CH 13 Plan with the help of Richard Norland as his personal expert?

Was it fair & just, bad faith, or a misinterpretation of the law that at the July 2,

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was it fair and just, or a misinterpretation of the law that Circuit Judges dismissed an appeal for failure to prosecute without further notice despite evidence of title fraud?

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-01-10
2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2024)
2024-05-14
Application (23A1012) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 28, 2024.
2024-04-29
Application (23A1012) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 29, 2024 to July 28, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Brent Evan Webster
Brent Evan Webster — Petitioner