No. 24-5732
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation forum-transfer judicial-misconduct procedural-rules substantive-law writ-of-prohibition
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Why have Judge's of the Western District of Louisiana (Lake Charles) Division been Practicing Law?
2. Why have Plaintiff substantive rights been violated by procedural rules?
3. Why is Plaintiff seeking Writ of Prohibition under rule 20.3(a) for Extra- Ordinary writ under U.S. Supreme court rules 28USCA 1651(a)?
4. Why didnt Judge and Mag. Judge change Forum 28usca 1631 when they seen that the suit was a constitutional violation and Plaintiff was stating substantive Law?!
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether judges in the Western District of Louisiana have improperly practiced law and violated plaintiff's substantive rights through procedural rules
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2024-12-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-09-30
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Jeremy D. Foster
Jeremy Dewayne Foster — Petitioner