1. Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in violation of Supreme Court precedents 1 erred by affirming federal convictions for non-criminal conduct and by denying an evidentiary hearing when unimpeachable, exonerating, newly discovered evidence proves "actual innocence."

2. When an actually innocent person is federally convicted of non-criminal conduct, is there no post-conviction remedy when the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ignores or misinterprets multiple controlling Supreme Court precedents (See footnote 1) that would otherwise mandate vacating the wrongful convictions?

Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred by affirming federal convictions for non-criminal conduct and denying an evidentiary hearing when newly discovered evidence proves actual innocence