No. 24-5696
Gregory Savoy v. Peter Franchot, Comptroller of Maryland
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: chemical-lobotomy constitutional-rights customary-international-law due-process federal-rules-of-procedure judicial-notice
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Copyright Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Copyright Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under united rules of evidence (state and federal,) can the courts of America deny a request for judicial notice of a fact "whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned " when that denial aids and abets a brightline crime against humanity under Customary International Law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts can deny judicial notice of a scientifically verifiable fact when such denial potentially constitutes a crime against humanity under Customary International Law
Docket Entries
2025-03-13
Case considered closed.
2024-12-09
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 30, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2024-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-10-29
Waiver of right of respondent Peter Franchot, Comptroller of Maryland to respond filed.
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Gregory Savoy
Gregory Scott Savoy — Petitioner
Peter Franchot, Comptroller of Maryland
Jessica K. Wisner — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent