Jamie Patrick Hahn v. Angela Reaves, Warden, et al.
1. Will zhrs Court review the validity of the indick ment which iS @
double Jd &¢pardy Violakion by the Tiled date of return? As well as
the court's lack of prooF of return yia minute Ctranserints) which
has been the lew a Georgia Be over I00 years?
2. Uill ths Coort reviev the right end legality of the Georgia
Supreme Court te re-write lew and chenge whet the General
Assembly Sepplied as a deYined legal L£erm?
3. Will this Court review the Standard of whet Conseltvces
proo} oF venve interms oF eu idence needed ok trial?
4. Will this Court review the standard of perjured evidence,
what constitutes Jolee evidence, and the remedy o} such?
5. Will this Court review how the Sixth Amendment right bo
Counsel apples to post -indict ment int errogat ton and alter
an at Virmegive right to counsel hes heen medeT?
Whether the Georgia Supreme Court improperly denied the petitioner's habeas corpus petition by failing to review false evidence and potential Sixth Amendment right to counsel violations