1. Given Deputy Twombly's admission on the record (PagelD //500, 9-14)
that the only factor establishing reasonable suspicion to seize the
Parcel was its state of origin being a "source state," was this single
factor sufficient? See, Terry v.Ohio, 592 U.S. 1. 21. 88 U.S. S.r.t.
1868 (1968) and United States v. Urrieta. 520 F.5d 569 (6th fir. 2008).

2. Was the warrantless search of the Parcel an illegal search and
seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment,
established in Ex Parte Jackson. 24 LED 877. 96 US 727 (1878)?given the standard

Whether a single factor of a parcel's state of origin is sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for seizure and whether a warrantless search of the parcel violated the Fourth Amendment