No. 24-5683
Ronald Champney v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting categorical-approach crime-of-violence hobbs-act section-924c third-circuit-court
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
In light of the holding in United States v. Taylor that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), is it debatable among jurists of reason that aiding and abetting Hobbs Act robbery is similarly not a crime of violence?
Does aiding and abetting Hobbs Act robbery qualify as a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In light of the holding in United States v. Taylor that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), is it debatable among jurists of reason that aiding and abetting Hobbs Act robbery is similarly not a crime of violence?
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2024)
Attorneys
Ronald Champney
Samuel J. B. Angell — Defender Assoc. of Phi., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent