No. 24-5669

Becky M. Peterson v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2024-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: child-welfare court-procedure due-process family-law parental-rights reunification-services
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

The trial court erred in determining that it was in the best interest to terminate Becky's parental rights to J C.C, J.D.C, S A P,

DHHS Failed to provide services to the family to work on reunifying,

The state foiled to find workers for Becky 's visits

Becky was not given case plans and's court reports during the entire case and still is not allowed court reports or case plans per judge Michael L. Long Journal entry 4/4/2024 which are very important parts of fire reunifying process.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court erred in terminating parental rights without providing adequate reunification services and case plan documentation

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-12-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Becky M. Peterson
Becky M. Peterson — Petitioner