FILED AN APPEAL NOV. 8TH AOAS^ To A MOV. S/VFE T AC~V
DEN\ AL. APP. CRT CLERK CLA\MED APPEAL. WAS
REF TED FOR REHEAR\NQ W\TV\ A SUPERVISORY
RQRRjPRo SE.UNT\MELV.
ORDER MARCWaG,/
AGA\NST Y\Y
; NEVER NQT\F\ED OF HERAPP. COUNSEL WAS APPOVNTED
REQUEST FOR SELF REPRESENTATION
APPOINTMENT,COUNSEL. NEVER
MEFMTS ^AND argued aN favor
AH \N ACCURATE REARING DATEUSED APPELLANTS tACTHoNS OR
OF THE STATE UNTVKELY u S\NG*
OF OCT. \8;aoa,3 ; WHERE HEKR\mi
SDR COURT.
APPEA L TO BE HEARD RV D\STRTT
Appellate court us\n<5, proper dates and merits 3chec V\WAS NOT APPEALLED. SUR ORDER FROM XLL>
ALLOW PET\T\ONERS
due process violations .

Whether the appellate court's denial of a pro se appeal and failure to provide proper notice constitutes a due process violation