No. 24-5637
IFP
Tags: custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment miranda-rights objective-inquiry self-incrimination
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. During a custodial interrogation, may police ignore an individual's repeated and unambiguous demands to "cut off questioning"?
2. May speculation into an individual's subjective motivations provide the context that renders an otherwise plain Miranda invocation ambiguous?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
During a custodial interrogation, may police ignore an individual's repeated and unambiguous demands to 'cut off questioning'?
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-03
Reply of petitioner Kyle Trevor Flack filed. (Distributed)
2024-11-19
Brief of respondent Kansas in opposition filed.
2024-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 27, 2024 (30-day extension).
2024-10-07
Motion of Kansas for an extension of time submitted.
2024-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2024 to November 27, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. (Request for 30-day extension)
2024-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2024)
2024-08-07
Application (24A132) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until September 26, 2024.
2024-08-02
Application (24A132) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 27, 2024 to October 26, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Kansas
Anthony John Powell — Office of the Kansas Attorney General, Respondent
Kristafer Ross Ailslieger — Respondent
Kyle Trevor Flack
Clayton James Perkins — Capital Appellate Defender Office, Petitioner