Camille A. Abboud v. Iryna Abboud
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Where Florida 7th (Seventh) Judicial Circuit Judges AND the U.S. Middle District of Florida REPEATEDLY VIOLATED the Petitioner 's the US & FL Constitutional, Civil and Fathers ' Rights, MAINLY in the Order " Order Determining Respondent to Be Vexatious Litigant AND Ordering Co unset ' issued on November 13th. 2023 . Instinctively Prejudicial & Intentionally VIOLATING the Petitioner 's 6th Amendment as of February 2nd, 2023, the Pleadings filed by the Petitioner "For Orders - Social Investigation - Retrieval of Tools of the Trade & Related Items & Documents - THREE prior Court Orders were IGNORED, filed July 26t,,, 2023 & October 29th, 2023, Motions "For the Recusal of Judges" filed November 14th, 2023, AND Petitioner 's Notice/Petition "Objecting to the Destruction of ALL Evidence since August 30th, 2021 - Date of the Initial Assault ", filed June 16th, 2023 & November 17th, 2023 AND Notice/Petition "Objecting to The Pre-Trial Stipulation on November 21st, 2023. Then, the U.S. Middle District of Florida - Jacksonville - Division, on August 28th, 2024. "Dismissed With Prejudice " the Amended Complaint, as Ordered, on August 26th, 2023, again VIOLATING the Plaintiff's Civil, Constitutional and Parenting Rights. The Second Amended Complaint filed against the State of Florida, St. Johns County, the St. Johns Sheriff, the St. Johns State Attorney, the Florida Department of Children & Families (DCF) and the 7th Judicial Circuit Judges for Intentionally & Maliciously VIOLATING the Plaintiff 's Civil, Constitutional & Parenting Rights among other Federal Protection Acts. In 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court established, in Faretta v. California, that Defendants have a Constitutional Right to Self-Representation, implied in the 6th Amendment, and that Judges MUST ALLOW Self-Representation if Defendant are Competent to Participate in Criminal Proceedings. Again, in 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that the Right of Self-Representation is NOT limited to Criminal Cases but also applies to Civil Cases in Indiana v. Edwards, declining an invitation to overrule Faretta, and stated again that the Constitution Guarantees (Criminal and/or Civil) Defendants the Opportunity to Exercise Their Constitutional Rights, mainly the US Constitution ' Sixth Amendment for Self-Representation as the Petitioner is a highly educated and Competent US Citizen. When the Petitioner "Objected " to the stated above ORDERS in open-recorded Court, invoking HIS Right for Self-Representation & "exposing" the Conspiracy of his prejudiced - accusers (ALL Defendants) mainly after Eight (8) Florida Attorneys had failed to even appeal one Prejudicial Order, at a cost of Over $150.000 (Raiding HIS Retirement Accounts), the Highly Educated Competent, US Citizen, himself, filed SIX 16) Florida 5DCA Appeals. FIVE (5) Florida Supreme Court Appeals. Pro Se Civil & Constitutional Federal Claims (ALL involved in this Prejudicial Conspiracy) in Florida 's US Middle District Unconstitutionally & Willfully . Maliciously
Whether a retired Army Colonel's constitutional and parental rights were systematically violated by Florida state and federal judges through prejudicial orders and dismissals