No. 24-5628
Angel Landa-Arevalo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: competency constitutional-rights mental-health pre-trial-detention sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was Petitioner's right to a speedy trial violated under the Sixth Amendment? Should the trial judge have ordered a mental health evaluation when urged to do so by both government and defense counsel who argued a bona fide doubt had been raised about Petitioner's competency to stand trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner's right to a speedy trial violated under the Sixth Amendment and should the trial judge have ordered a mental health evaluation given the government psychologist's testimony?
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2024)
Attorneys
Angel Landa-Arevalo
William Dixon Lunn Jr. — Attorney At Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent