No. 24-5624
Omar Jorge Valle Estrada v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-procedure federal-appeals fifth-circuit judicial-review sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
The circuits are split on whether a request for a lower sentence preserves for review a claim that the district court has not adequately explained a sentence under § 3553(a). Was the Fifth Circuit correct that no such issue was preserved?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2024)
Attorneys
Omar Jorge Valle Estrada`
John Charles Bennett — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent