No. 24-5618
Daramis Lee Sharkey v. James M. Holloway, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process evidence-misrepresentation jury-bias prosecutorial-misconduct trial-fairness
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is it true that actions of prosecutor in misrepresenting in evidence can advance a substantial doing so have profoundly impress a jury making significant burden on the jury's deliberations? error because
2. Is it true also a denial of due process when State had not sufficiently raise evidence s allows it to go uncorrected when it appears?
The issue r exist the (Wt K, yet, je is the solution of the Senate prosecutors erroneous statement petitioner court uncoup adequate basis in against
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prosecutor's misrepresentations of evidence can substantially impact a jury's perception and constitute a denial of due process when erroneous statements are left uncorrected
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2024)
Attorneys
Daramis Lee Sharkey
Daramis Lee Sharkey — Petitioner