No. 24-5614
Hussein Kadhim Abood Khalaf v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: deportation-consequences immigration-law ineffective-assistance moral-turpitude padilla-standard plea-bargain
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-10-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. When deportation consequences posed by a criminal charge are not clear, do attorneys render ineffective assistance by telling an indigent client their own research shows no certainty of deportation from a plea bargain, but adding they should consult an immigration attorney?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When deportation consequences posed by a criminal charge are not clear, do attorneys render ineffective assistance by telling an indigent client their own research shows no certainty of deportation from a plea bargain, but adding they should consult an immigration attorney?
Docket Entries
2024-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2024)
2024-07-15
Application (24A37) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 14, 2024.
2024-07-02
Application (24A37) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 16, 2024 to September 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Hussein Khalaf
Mohammed Ahmed — Federal Public Defender's Office E.D. Mo., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent