No. 24-5605

In Re Shannon Clark

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: all-writs-act constitutional-interpretation equitable-remedy federal-court-procedure judicial-power mandamus
Latest Conference: 2024-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Pursuant to Article III, § 2 of the United States Constitution and Fed. R. Civ. P. 79(a)(1)(A), does not The All Writs Act (28 USCS § 1651(a)) invests the United States Supreme Court justice(s) with a power essentially and equitable and, as such, not generally available to provide alternatives to other adequate remedies at law, to issue a mandamus order to compel Clerk David J. Smith in the Federal Court below to fulfill his duty?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the All Writs Act empowers the Supreme Court to issue a mandamus order compelling a federal court clerk to fulfill his duty

Docket Entries

2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-08-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Clark, In Re Shannon
Shannon Clark — Petitioner