Did the Supreme court of California in error, abuse discretion and show bias in denying Petition ( S284766 ) and application for stay and left unresolved conflicted issue of law and factual issue?( Appendix A)

Did the 5th district appeal court in error, abuse discretion and show biased in denying petition (F085100) (notified to petitioner on March 26 24 regarding Jan 25 24 opinion along with the remittitur notification) from Judgments of dismissals from the Superior Court of Tulare County VCU289294 & left unresolved conflicted issues of law and factual issues based on challenging rulings from the Superior Court of Tulare County VCU289294 ? (-See Exhibit A attached to S284766)

.Did Tulare court in error and abuse discretion in granting judgment of dismissal on Oct 6 22 based on Sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend on the second amended complaint on Sep 27 & 20- 22 ruling and other previous rulings include sustaining demurrer? (dated May 3rd 22, Aug 09th 22, July 12, 2022, and May 17th 22).

. Denying the Motion to file an amended complaint?

. Denying petition to relieve Plaintiff from the Tort act (heard Oct 6 22) ?. ( see Record on appeal of F085100 pgs 172)(T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (2017) 4 Cal.5th 145,162.)

Did the lower court incorrectly apply the statute of limitations When injuries described under Section 1983 in this action and purported causes of action are not subject to the claim presentation requirements of the Government Claims Act. (Williams v. Horvath (1976) 16 Cal.3d 834, 842., .Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 (1985),Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989) ?

Did lower courts in error accept Tulare superior court false, unreasonable, concealment of facts based factual findings(lnsurance Co. of North America v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 122 Cal. App. 3d 905,911 [176 Cal.Rptr. 365]), where they do not withstand scrutiny when considered in light of the entire record (Duke v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd. (1988) 204 Cal. App. 3d 455, 460 [251 Cal.Rptr. 185)?

Did lower courts deprived the petitioner of a fundamental fairness and her due process rights? Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644)

Did the lower courts fail to permit petitioner (victim of constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Acts) to remedy deprivation of Constitutional Rights,privileges, and immunities due to Official abuse, In Ascolese v. Southeastern Turnpike Authority, C 925 F. supp. 351?

Did the lower courts offer unconstitutional opinions under constitution and failed to make decisions on the actual facts of the case and find hypothetical facts ( by violating separation of power under constitution ) outside the case that enabled the court to reach a wrong or corrupt opinion (See Shelby County v. Holder

Whether the California Supreme Court improperly denied a petition and application for stay, leaving unresolved legal and factual conflicts