Otis Brandon v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, et al.
1) Did the lower courts fail to consider numerous ca.ses alleged
agianst the parmaceutical company Janssen and Johnson &
Johnson for misrepresentation, falsifying labels, etc?
2) Did the lower courts fail to consider the numerous cases
were the Federal Drug Administration cited the company Janssen
Pharmaceuticals and Johnson & Johnson for failure to inform
of the dangerous side effects of thier drug?
3) Did the lower courts follow a misinterpretation of judgement
passed by other Justices and other courts?
4) Did the lower courts fail to include in their decision same
/ similar issues decided in other cases? (see related cases)
5) Did the lower court follow a error of fact?
6) Didi the lower courts fail to take into account numerous
case were ruled against the defendants for allegations sighted
by plaintiff?
7) Did the lower courts fail to take into account the plaintiffs
"lack of Capacity" and Serious Mental Illness?
Did the lower courts fail to properly consider evidence of pharmaceutical misconduct and misrepresentation in cases against Janssen and Johnson & Johnson?