Whether the Sixth Circuit erroneously reversed the District Courts grant of habeas relief based on trial counsels ineffective assistance in failing to raise the preclusive effect of sentencing findings in a subsequent criminal proceeding, where state law recognizes collateral estoppel as a defense.

Whether the Sixth Circuit erroneously reversed the District Court's grant of habeas relief based on trial counsel's ineffective assistance in failing to raise the preclusive effect of sentencing findings in a subsequent criminal proceeding