IS T_T A FACJLfi LLV UkICaN STXTCJTXUMAL ACT DF
THB. M. L * ASSEAft&LV TO ASS'EAARLF f£-T)
ZlKXAAXMrtL STATUSES XklTO M,C G*jS* /lI-7 . / FZ3£
STATE: £QURT EklH/UlC&MELMT Q F" REPEAT QFFEJilhEP SEAP
TEhMLES?
hTK (AlflKE COL/MT/ SUPELRXOR CUURT ^TLlhCE KEITH n.
&-kae>cm v/ hEU'i class access to courts }bv H/iim/a
R&T^LXTORV &5(-PMTS HEARJLkiC , kFP£lVXAl<2 PLAlN~
TXFF OF MXS A*ye»HT Ta HEARh.
HIS CASE MUkt\&ER 7ZI BS A.XS —
MUSSED JMXTth PkELS 'UhXCE Hkl UklKMOlUkl h ATE
TXh/VS> AMb QRaUklhSL(AUh at&E&uuc
)
Talk STATE £>CU/HA/aR AEUSEL HJLS b ESC. RE TX UU
XM
CLRx AAXMtf-L. STATUSES. JLKiTO. CRXk/X k\AUSTATUTE
MQT FA£Xfl/_£_V CEAfEML ASSEMMLV ACT ASSEAABLXUG

•s
L^I'h STATE CZQURT f\ B LiS El hESCAETXOU IN XTS
FfTLL Lib EL TZ2 TR A M FgR CASS TO. C3) STLfh&E PA NEC
FOR PROCESS^ PlFTEP PLAXklTXFF CLRXkllEh FACIAL
UM<LQM£TXTLiTXaAJ/TL. FDR CSMERAL. rfXSEAA&LY
TQ ASSEkh&LS CJPXAAXkfAL STATUSES XklTO STATUTE
FDR STATE COURT LISE Xkl ELMHAAIOM& REPEAT QFF&h
&FJR SE MTEAULELS 9

A STATE LQTA.7GR COURT MAS bECXbEb FEDERAL GLLIEST-
JLQkl JLkl kAAkMEJlTHAT CLlklFLXCXS lAlXTHXJS
UCCXSXON Ohi XbtEear lx er.
klTXCAL. JLSSUE.

Whether the North Carolina General Assembly's act of assembling criminal statutes into law conflicts with state court jurisdiction and due process for repeat offenders