No. 24-5558

Bryant D. Aron v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fairness-doctrine federal-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion plea-agreement review-standard sentencing
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Plea agreements under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) bind a district court if the court accepts the agreement. A district court can also reject the agreement or defer pending the completion of a presentence investigation report. If a district court does not explicitly do any of the three options, and the status is ambiguous heading into a sentencing hearing, should a reviewing court consider the agreement accepted out of fairness to the parties?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a district court's ambiguous status regarding a plea agreement under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) should be considered accepted by a reviewing court for fairness to the parties

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2024)
2024-07-03
Application (23A1170) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until September 13, 2024.
2024-06-27
Application (23A1170) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

Bryant D. Aron
Adam Clay StevensonUniversity of Wisconsin Law School, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent